Home » Blog

Logan: The X-Men Go Dark

I saw Logan over the weekend and I was thoroughly impressed. I should start of by saying that I am not a huge fan of the X-Men movies. I loved the animated series in the 90’s and I was also a fan of the comic books, but I found the films to be overly polished and generic. The first X-Men movie came out all the way back in 2000, so the series actually predates the glut of super hero movies that have been awash over us over the past decade and a half. You could argue that the X-Men series started the craze of super hero movies, and specifically the Marvel franchises that have grossed billions of dollars for three different studios.

But Logan is different. After watching it last weekend, I don’t feel like I watched a typical super hero movie. It certainly didn’t feel like a typical X-Men movie. This movie was gritty, it was dark, it was intensely violent. And I’m not talking the typical comic book movie/adventure movie violence with lots of explosions and deaths of faceless and nameless characters. This was a graphically violent film complete with decapitations, engorging and hand-to-hand combat, close up, look you in the eye killing with enough blood to sink a ship. While it pushed the boundary to feeling gratuitous, it never quite got there, but it was close.

Also, Logan gave us the character of Wolverine the way he was meant to be. We never see him in his X-Men leotard, er, uniform,  and I think losing that motif helps take this movie away from the super hero genre and makes it a straight action movie. He is also constantly dropping F-bombs and he has a lot more attitude. Now, the character of Logan/Wolverine always had a lot of attitude in the previous X-Men films and he always walked a very precarious line, and it’s clear that the figurative shackles were off in this film and director James Mangold had the freedom to give us the cold-blooded loner that Logan always should have been, despite the R-rating that it generated. To be honest, in order to do the X-Men right, it needs to be an R-rated property, and Wolverine is the most R-rated of them all. In fact, the reason that The Wolverine failed, in my opinion, is because they had to keep it PG-13 and couldn’t properly unleash the character to be all it needed to be. That was not an issue in Logan.

In a lot of ways Logan feels like The Terminator meets The Hunger Games. It’s essentially a chase movie, and the forces chasing Logan, Charles and the young girl Laura are persistent, powerful and will not stop until they have Laura in their clutches. We also see that they have no qualms about killing people that get in their way, and no amount of collateral damage is too much. Laura, however, is a genetically engineered killing machine, even though she’s just a young girl of 8 or 9-years old. Laura is a ferocious fighter and kills her victims brutally and mercilessly, essentially showing them the same kind of treatment that they’d likely show her.

But this movie is more than just about action and near-gratuitous violence. Believe it or not, this is also a movie about family. We learn early in the movie that Laura was created using Logan’s DNA, which is why she has the wolverine claws and an adamantium skeleton. Even though Logan isn’t her father in the truest sense of the word, his character arc takes him from disinterested mercenary to protective father figure. Likewise, Laura goes from being distant and petulant to being loyal and loving. I feel what Mangold and co-writers Scott Frank and Michael Green did really well was taking a character that we’re all familiar with and giving him new limitations to deal with while simultaneously adding a new character that we don’t know and developing her in a way that made us care about her and about the relationship between the two of them.

The story line was also very effectively told. There were definitely three acts in there, and it followed a classic Hero’s Journey. There is a clear Ordinary World that Logan lives in. There is a clear Call to Adventure and Logan Refuses that Call and that is followed by Logan Crossing the Threshold into the Special World. I’m not going to list out all of the Hero’s Journey stages, but suffice it to say that all of the stages are represented in the script. That gives Logan a very engaging story for an action film and Mangold, Frank and Green took some chances and those risks were paid off with a story that has some surprising moments and some surprisingly dramatic moments as well.

When you combine the well-structured story with the depth of the characters and the strength of the development in their relationships, we are left with a very strong script that allowed us to engage with these characters on an emotional level that isn’t common in an action thriller. Logan really is a movie that has it all. It’s a dramatic action film with terrific acting and likable characters that the audience actively roots for. If you’re an aspiring screenwriter who is working on an action script, this is a script that could be instructive for you.

Logan is also a movie that’s worth seeing for its sheer entertainment value. It is a highly entertaining movie that I’ve already heard is getting Oscar love, a la Mad Max: Fury Road. It’s probably worth pumping the breaks on that notion, but I could certainly see this film at least getting some sort of attention, provided people haven’t forgotten about it by the end of the year.

Either way, Logan is a film with great performances by Hugh Jackman, Patrick Stewart and Dafnee Keen, as well as the supporting cast. Those performances humanize the characters and make them likable. The action is also top-notch, but seeing this film for the surprising quality of the screenplay is what should drive you to see it if you haven’t already. Be warned that it’s one of the most violent films you’ll ever see, but the violence is necessary to the telling of this particular story, and that’s what keeps it from becoming gratuitous.

All in all, this is a film that is worth seeing. You should go and check it out if you haven’t already. You’ll be glad that you did.

2016 Winner for Best Picture – Moonlight

The Oscar ceremony had one of its most controversial and memorable endings ever when Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway were given the wrong envelope and erroneously announced that La La Land had won Best Picture, when, in fact, it was Moonlight that had achieved the Academy’s highest honor. Once all of the dust had settled and order had been restored, we all learned that, for once, the Academy chose important and reflective over one that was entertaining and escapist.

Following the Academy for as long as I have, I was certain that La La Land was going to be the winner. It tied a record with 14 nominations, and the other films that achieved that mark (Titanic and All About Eve) both took home the statue for Best Picture on Oscar night. Plus, it also seems that when one particular film receives 10 or more nominations, it generally receives Best Picture.  Plus, La La Land won the Golden Globe Award for Best Musical or Comedy, and it started piling up the big awards as Oscar night went on.  With all of the uproar over reading the wrong name, I think Faye Dunaway can be forgiven for seeing it on the card and presuming it to be the winner.
However, Moonlight also won a top Golden Globe Award for Best Picture, Drama. While it was “only” nominated for 8 Oscars, that’s still a good number of nominations, and it was one of the most critically acclaimed films of the year with an astounding 98% on Rotten Tomatoes. Moonlight is an important film on a number of levels. Not only was it written and directed by an African-American, but it also has an entirely African-American cast, and it deals with issues of poverty and drugs that have hung over the Africa-American community for decades. Those are the macro-issues of the film. The micro-issues of the film followed the lead character as he tries to come to grips with his sexuality in a largely intolerant community.

This feels especially important since the previous year’s Oscar ceremony was marred by the lack of racial diversity in the nominees. However, the critical acclaim of not only Moonlight, but also other primarily African-American stories like Hidden Figures and Fences showed that these were not just sympathy nominations. These films truly deserved to be recognized among the best films of the year.
Moonlight is told in a unique way. Its running time is just under 2 hours, and it’s told in three separate segments that follow Chiron as he grows from a young boy being bullied through being a pubescent teen being bullied and on into young adulthood as a remade young man who has taken control of his life, albeit in a less than exemplary way. As we follow Chiron through these stages, we see that this is a boy who is being forced to grow up fast. He has a mother who is addicted to drugs. Other kids in the neighborhood mercilessly bully him, and he thinks he might be attracted to Kevin, the one kid who is actually nice to him.

The film opens with Juan (Mahershala Ali in a performance that would net him the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor), a local drug dealer in Miami who is checking on one of his sellers. As he talks, he sees Chiron run by, being chased by other kids. He tracks Chiron down hiding in an abandoned apartment, and offers him some food and a place to stay until Chiron is ready to talk. Juan takes Chiron home to his sister Teresa (Janelle Monáe) who takes care of him and offers him some food and a bed. Juan takes Chiron home the next day and we meet his mother Paula (Naomie Harris), who we see right away is strung out and clearly on drugs.

We actually learn a lot in the first couple of minutes. We learn that Juan is a drug dealer, but we also see that he has a good heart as he takes Chiron under his wing. In a very touching scene Chiron asks Juan what a faggot is. Juan tells him that it’s a word people use to make gay people feel bad, and then Chiron asks if he is one. Juan tells him that he may be gay, but to never let anyone call him a faggot.  Chiron asks how he’ll know and Teresa tells him that he doesn’t need to know now. He’ll know when he knows.

What makes this excellent filmmaking is that we’re introduced to characters that we should not like. Juan should be especially unlikable, since he’s a drug dealer, and we’ve rightly been conditioned to think of drug dealers as bad people. However, Juan is given depth as a character, because we’re shown that he also has a good heart. He sees that Chiron is in trouble and he goes out of his way to help him. What’s more, as the first act goes on, we see Juan become not only a mentor, but almost a fatherly-like figure for Chiron.

An equally powerful scene happens a couple of minutes later after Juan has caught Paula smoking crack that he sold to her boyfriend. Chiron is over at the house and he asks Juan if he sells drugs. Unable to say yes, Juan only nods. Disappointed, Chiron shakes his head before asking Juan if he knows if his mother does drugs. Ashamed of himself, Juan can only nod again. Chiron gets up and leaves the table, leaving behind Juan, who now has a look of such shame on his face and in his posture, it wouldn’t surprise me if that one moment won Ali the Oscar. His entire performance is amazing, and I’m not taking anything away from his performance as a whole. But that one moment is so heartbreaking and feels so real, it certainly would have been on my mind if I had been filling out an Oscar ballot.

It also helped add to the amazing level of drama in the film. This is nothing less than a total betrayal for Chiron. This man who has taken him under his wing and made his life better is now also responsible for the deterioration of his mother. We see it in Chiron that he feels betrayed, and we see the shame and guilt in Juan for realizing that he’s betrayed this boy. However, his ultimate betrayal is yet to come.

We then move into Chiron’s teenage years, and he’s a skinny kid who can’t defend himself. We’re told that Juan is dead, but he still goes to Teresa’s house in order to escape his mother.  He’s still getting bullied, but now that they’re all bigger, the bullying is decidedly more dangerous. Also, Paula is completely strung out, and practically beats Chiron in order to get more money out of him to buy more drugs. Kevin is still the only kid who’s nice to him, and they happen to meet up at the beach one night, as they both went there looking to escape. Kevin has some pot with him and they share a blunt. The conversation becomes more personal and they begin to kiss.  Kevin then puts his hand down Chiron’s pants and strokes him off.

The next day at school, Chiron sees Kevin sitting alone at lunch, and he’s about to sit with him until one of the bullies does. The bully then challenges Kevin to a game where he’ll pick out a victim and Kevin has to punch him until he won’t get up. Naturally, the bully selects Chiron, who stands defiantly in front of him. Kevin punches Chiron, but he defiantly gets back up. Kevin punches again, and again Chiron stands in front of him. After the third punch, the other three bullies start stomping on Chiron until a security guard runs up and chases them off. The next day, Chiron shows up to school and walks with determination to his classroom and viciously slams a chair into the lead bully and attacks him before being pulled away and led out of the school in handcuffs. Kevin shamefully watches him get led away, and Chiron looks at Kevin with that same look of betrayal that the younger Chiron looked at Juan. The men in Chiron’s life continue to betray him.

Finally, we come to Chiron as a grown man. He’s grown hard. He got out of jail, and he and his mother moved to Atlanta where he could start over. The years have hardened him. He’s now muscular and tough. The weakling is gone, and we see this in his new profession of a drug dealer. Juan’s betrayal is now complete. He was the best man that Chiron ever knew, and he’s following in his footsteps. But he’s still as sensitive as ever. We see this in how he interacts with his mother, who now lives in a rehab facility. She lives the life of regret, as she knows that she didn’t do right by him. She tells him that she understands if he doesn’t love her, but he has to know that she loves him.

Chiron gets a call from Kevin. He’s recently out of jail himself now, and is working as a cook back in Miami. Chiron drives all the way down there, but is betrayed again to find out that Kevin is married and has a young child. Chiron confesses to Kevin that he never let another man touch him like Kevin did. There is a moment of connection between them and the last thing we see is Chiron leaning his head on Kevin’s shoulder.

I think that Moonlight is ultimately a story about love, and how elusive love can be. I’m not even talking about romantic love versus familial love or platonic love, but any kind of love. People need to have love in their lives in order to feel complete. Even the hardest of the hard have something that they love and even if they don’t know it, desire love at a core level. A character like Chiron is someone who spends two thirds of the film trying to find any kind of love that he can because the one person who should be providing it to him, his mother, is unable to do so. The problem for him is that every time he finds love, the love is followed up almost immediately by a betrayal.

Moonlight actually has a very simple concept, but it is executed in a complex way that created a story that is dramatic and compelling. It doesn’t matter to me on way or the other that it has an all African-American cast or that it deals with love from an LGBTQ point of view. This is a well-made film that tells a dramatic and interesting story that is worthy of your time.

Did the Academy get it right?

Yes, they did. Moonlight is an exceptional film, but it wasn’t my favorite film of the year. If the award was Most Important Picture, then Moonlight is absolutely your winner, with a nod as well to Hidden Figures. If the award was for Most Entertaining Picture, then I think you’d have to go with La La Land. That wasn’t my favorite film of the year either, but I can see why it got so much love. I can also see why it got so much hate. I personally think it’s a terrific film, but it wasn’t the best film of the year. I actually had three favorites. I loved Arrival, Hell or Highwater and Hacksaw Ridge. I could have voted for any of those 3, and would probably have picked Arrival. I thought that all of those films had the perfect balance of entertainment value, drama and intensity. I also like Fences a lot, but it felt more like a stage play to me than a film. Lion was also very good, but it came up short for me in a couple of key areas.  With all that said, even though it wasn’t my personal favorite film of the year, I do have to say that the Academy did get it right with Moonlight.

Howard Beale and Donald Trump: As Mad as Hell and Not Going to Take it Anymore

I tend to stay away from politics in this blog. I prefer this blog to be a source of entertainment and sometimes education, and politics have become so divisive over the past few years that I would prefer not to alienate readers over potentially controversial political positions. However, it is undeniable that cinema is often a vehicle for politics. Many great filmmakers over the years have used their films to espouse their political points of view, and in fact most films have some general point of view about the state of the world, which inevitably circle back to a political philosophy.

There is one film, in particular, that intersects cinema and politics in a way that few films ever have, and that film is Network. This is one of my favorite films and I have always contended that it predicted many of the things that we live with in our lives today. It predicted the advent of reality television. It predicted radical terrorism. It predicted news divisions becoming for profit entities as networks were acquired by corporations. It predicted that multi-national corporations would become de-facto governments (lobbying). And it predicted that the news would start to become more sensational (Fox News, MSNBC) and entertainment-based. A straight line can be drawn from The Howard Beale Show in Network to The Daily Show, Last Week Tonight, The Colbert Report, Full Frontal With Samantha Bee, and many others.

And now, I daresay that Network has also predicted the rise of Donald Trump. There’s no way that the filmmakers could have known that Trump would be the individual, but they did predict that a charismatic man could grow in power and prominence by taking people’s fears and stirring them into anger. I have posted this clip on the blog before, but it’s worth another look for our purposes.

Last year’s presidential campaign, especially during the Republican primaries, was the most watched in our lifetime, and that had to do with Donald Trump. What’s more, since he started his campaign out by making some very controversial statements, the media, always now in need of high ratings, followed Trump constantly in the hopes that he would continue to do that, which he did in a way that continuously upped the ante. It all became a vicious cycle that ended up providing Trump with millions of dollars’ worth of free airtime. His campaign sucked all of the air out of the room, and none of the other Republican candidates were able to get their messages out.

In fact, more people watched the Republican debates than had ever watched debates before. Do you think that those new viewers were watching because they cared about policy? Of course not. If that had been the case, then the Democrat debates would have had the same numbers for viewership, and they did not. No, people were watching because reality TV had taken over the presidential race. They watched to see what outrageous thing Trump would say next, or what kind of goofy facial expression he’d make, or whether he’d talk about the size of his dick.  And CNN and FOX and ABC and NBC gladly displayed this sideshow for all of the ratings it got them and all of the advertising dollars that followed.

Watch the clip again. Watch what happens after Howard Beale (Peter Finch) starts to go on his rant, specifically right after he intensely looks into the camera and tells the people, “I want you to get mad!” With that, news producer Diana Christensen (Faye Dunaway) starts to smile as though sensing an opportunity. Then, by the time Beale has completely broken down and is beseeching his audience to go to their windows and yell outside, “I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this anymore!”, and Diana is told that people are doing just that in cities around the country, she exclaims, “We’ve hit the mother load!” Now, most people when they see someone having a breakdown will try and figure out a way to get that person some help. Diana looked at him as a way to improve her ratings.

There was a time when there were three news networks. During that time, anchormen like Walter Cronkite, Edward R. Murrow and David Brinkley gave us the news in a straightforward way. They were among the most trusted men in America. What’s more, the networks knew that operating in this way was not profitable, but they were willing to write off the news divisions as long as they were making enough money in other places. They saw presenting the news as their civic responsibility. Over the last 40 years, as Network predicted, as corporate entities gained control over the networks, news divisions were required to become more and more profitable. In order to become profitable, they had to have more viewers, and in order to get more viewers they have to be more and more sensational. Creating that sensationalism has garnered many news organizations much in profit, but they’ve gotten to the point where hardly anything on television news is believed anymore. At this point in time, are there any institutions that are less trusted than television news? I would venture to say that no, there is not.

Donald Trump came along last year and used that notion to his advantage. Again, look at the first 40 seconds of Beale’s rant during the clip. If you close your eyes, you might think that you’re listening to a Trump campaign speech. We live in a time where people have stopped believing that their government and other institutions that run our daily lives have our best interests at heart. In 1976, a fictional Howard Beale told America that, and he became the number one television star in the country.  Exactly forty years later, a real-life Donald Trump told America that and got elected President of the United States.

Therein lies the genius of the film Network. Give it a look if you haven’t seen it recently. Paddy Chayefsky’s brilliant screenplay and Sidney Lumet’s equally brilliant direction created a film that is timeless because it is timely. They created a character dubbed “The Mad Prophet”, and he attained a cult-like status. He attained that status because a news media, hungry for prophets, saw him as a useful tool. Until they didn’t to the point where their power brokers had to conceive of a notion that should have been inconceivable in order to get him off the air.

Now we have a man that the media saw as a useful tool, and their insatiable appetite for ratings and profit launched him to heights that the media probably didn’t believe possible. Network predicted that this could happen, and happened it has.

BSsentials – Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

DrStrangelovePoster

Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb is one of my favorite films, and actually feels terrifyingly apropos  as to what’s happening in the world today. Call it what you will: a dark comedy, a political satire, a macabre Cold War masterpiece. Any of those apply, but there are a couple of things that make this film essential viewing. It is incredibly funny and it is incredibly thoughtful. While the film’s director Stanley Kubrick had already made a strong name for himself in Hollywood by directing the Oscar nominated Spartacus, as well as critically acclaimed films like Paths of Glory and Lolita, it was Dr. Strangelove that took Kubrick to the next level. He would follow it up with 2001: A Space Odyssey and A Clockwork Orange and those three films in succession would help to solidify Kubrick as one of the greatest and most innovative film makers in Hollywood.

Why it’s essential

Dr. Strangelove is one of the greatest pieces of satire of all time, and calls into question the idea of peace through strength. It is one of the funniest movies ever made, and you don’t have to just take my word for it, as AFI has it at #3 on it’s list of 100 years, 100 laughs trailing only Tootsie and Some Like it Hot. This is one of those movies that makes you laugh in moments that you know you shouldn’t be laughing at, like the iconic moment where Colonel Kong (Slim Pickens) waves his hat and yells, “Yahoo!” as he rides the nuclear bomb (called “Hi There!”) down to his death, and the likely destruction of all mankind. This movie is so funny that there’s even a scene where one of the actors has to stifle a laugh. Peter Sellers, one of the great comedic actors of the 20th Century plays 3 roles, the sophisticated yet awkward Lt. Mandrake, who first discovers that General Ripper (Sterling Hayden) has gone insane and ordered his bomber wing to attack their targets inside the Soviet Union. Sellers also plays Merkin Muffley, the President of the United States, and he plays him as a paper tiger weakling who is talks tough early on, but as the situation spirals out of control we see that this man is in way over his head. (Sound familiar?) Finally Sellers also plays the title role, a crippled Nazi scientist who is now in the employ of the United States military and is an advisor to the president. Let that sentence sink in for a moment.

DrStrangeloveCharacter

One of the things that made Sellers so great was that he was not only the great physical comedian that many people are familiar with from him starring as the bumbling Inspector Clouseau from The Pink Panther series, but he was also brilliant at creating more subtle and more cerebral comedy. Kubrick was famous for demanding that his actors stay on script. Sellers was one of the few actors that he let riff, and there are a couple of scenes in Dr. Strangelove where Sellers brings the house down, both like here with his physical comedy, and here with his more cerebral comedy.

DrStrangeloveBuckTurdigeson

Another thing that’s brilliant about this film is the surprising comedic performances from two actors not necessarily known for their comedic chops. George C. Scott was about as serious an actor that ever lived. He made a career out of playing tough men in tough situations and responding in tough ways. Other than the animated The Rescuers Down Under in which he played the villain McLeach, I can’t think of another comedic role that he played, but comedy clearly came very naturally to him. In Dr. Strangelove he plays General Buck Turgidson, a staunch anti-communist, sexist brute who is as fanatical about the military as he is about national security. His performance in this film is boisterous and filled with extreme facial expressions and over the top pantomime. When you compare this role to, say to Bert Gordon, the quietly intense pool shark in The Hustler which he played just two years earlier, you can see the incredible range that he had. However there were a lot more Gordons than there were Turgidsons over the course of George C. Scott’s career, but his performance in Dr. Strangelove is right up there with Sellers in terms of how funny it is, and it’s really too bad that he didn’t do more comedy throughout the rest of his career.

DrStrangeloveRipper

The other actor that I’m referring to is Sterling Hayden, who most people will remember as the crooked cop who punches Michael Corleone in The Godfather. He also starred in one of Kubrick’s very early films, The Killing, as an ex-con trying to pull a heist on a horse racing track. In Dr. Strangelove he did exactly the opposite of what Scott did in that Hayden played his character absolutely straight. There were no pratfalls, no garish facial expressions, and ironically he was the character who went insane. He was flat emotionally and tonally, and that was exactly the right way to play that character. It was his dialogue and the straight manner in which he delivered his insane lines about our precious fluids and how communist infiltration was threatening our essence, and he played this straight insanity opposite Sellers’ Mandrake who was manically trying to get Ripper to divulge the secret code that could call of the attack. The juxtaposition and the irony of these performances is a full-on tutorial on compelling story telling. We have the calm, measured, calculating character who has lost his mind and is unleashing Armageddon against the frantic, frenetic, nervous sane character who is trying to stop him. That tension does what not every comedy is able to do and that’s create drama.

DrStrangeloveMissle

Ultimately, that is what makes Dr. Strangelove such a great film and what has allowed it to stand the test of time. It’s a comedy that is loaded with tension and drama. One of the techniques to creating great drama is giving your characters obstacles to overcome, and Kubrick and co-writers Terry Southern and Peter George did was create obstacles for their characters at every turn. There are far too many obstacles in this film to do any of them justice by going through the list, but the obstacles in this film do a ton to create not only drama, but a lot of the comedy as well. In fact, I would say that the drama and the comedy go hand in hand in this film precisely because they’re co-created by the obstacles that have been organically put into the script.

DrStrangeloveWarRoom

Overall, this is a superb film. It is a comedy that is loaded with drama. It takes perhaps the most serious topic off the 20th Century and used it as a back drop to create one of the 20th Century’s funniest films. It has actors that were best known for their dramatic roles and for bringing gravitas to the screen in the films they’ve been in, and yet gave among their greatest performances in this bitingly satirical dark comedy. Dr. Strangelove is a film fan’s film and should be essential viewing to any one who is a fan of cinema.

BSsentials – Pulp Fiction

PulpFictionPoster

Pulp Fiction changed the way I watched movies. I was 23-years old when it came out, and I was about 2 years away from moving to Los Angeles. At the time I thought that I was pretty learned in the ways of cinema. That’s the beauty and curse of youth; you’re not yet old enough to know what you don’t know. I knew very little of this film going into it. In fact, it wasn’t even on my radar until I read a review of it in the paper the day it came out. Based on that review, I went to a matinee and saw it with about 3 or 4 people in the entire theater. I was blown away. In fact, I was so blown away that I went out and told all of my friends that they needed to see this movie, and I dragged many of them to it. In all, I think I saw it 5 or 6 times in the theater, and by the sixth time, word of mouth had spread and the theater was packed. Pulp Fiction was a phenomenon and the prototypical 90’s movie. It was brutal and funny. It was violent and articulate. It was unmerciful and uplifting. This is a film that on the surface looks very clearly like one thing, but when you look under the surface you realize that it is another thing entirely. It’s a film with depth, breadth, wit, and wisdom, and it is one of my top 5 favorite films of all time.

Why it’s essential

Pulp Fiction is a film fan’s film. In the nearly two decades since its release, I’ll admit that some of the shine has come off of its director Quentin Tarantino as a film maker. Pulp Fiction was the second film he directed, following up Reservoir Dogs, plus he wrote the screenplays for cult classics True Romance and Natural Born Killers. He hasn’t really changed his style a whole lot since then, so the same motifs that made these films seem so edgy in the 90’s have now become somewhat stale. Don’t get me wrong. I’m still a huge fan of Tarantino, and he’s never made a film that I’ve disliked. Also, Inglourious Basterds is another BSsential that I’ll write about in upcoming weeks. However, the in-your-face edginess, the violence, the unapologetic drug use, and the eloquent but potentially offensive dialogue that allowed Pulp Fiction to burst on to the scene and announce that film making would be forever different didn’t evolve with the times. We’ve now become so desensitized to those motifs now that they’ve become either stale, or worse, cliche. Tarantino’s last couple of efforts suffer from that, I think, and even though I liked Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight, they were not at the same level of his best work.

But Pulp Fiction announced Tarantino’s arrival in grand fashion. When people think about it, I think they generally look at it as a violent film with witty dialogue, but it is so much more than that. Don’t forget that Tarantino won the Oscar for Best Original Screenplay and was nominated for Best Director.  The film was nominated for Best Picture, and should have won, as I articulated here. This is a film that defied convention in almost every way imaginable. The subject matter was edgy, if not downright taboo. The story was told in an unconventional and non-linear way that would have had story traditionalists up in arms. There were no, and I mean no relatable characters in this film. Everyone was either a murderer, a gangster, a thief, or some other sort of reprobate, and yet, we engage with these characters and root for them. But here’s the thing about Pulp Fiction that a lot of people miss. This is actually a morality play where everyone gets some sort of comeuppance, with one very important exception.

PulpFictionHoneyBunnyAndPumpkin

In order to prove that point, let’s go on a trip through the film. It opens in a coffee shop where Pumpkin (Tim Roth) and Honey Bunny (Amanda Plummer) sit in a booth and Pumpkin complains about how hard and dangerous it’s becoming to continue to rob liquor stores and he doesn’t want to do it anymore. Honey Bunny asks him the alternative, and he has the idea of robbing restaurants. The staff is very unlikely to want to risk their lives to save the owner’s money and taking the wallets of the customers will add to the take. Honey Bunny is ready to start right now, and Pumpkin yells out for everyone to be cool, this is a robbery, and Honey Bunny tells everyone to anti up, or she’ll execute every last one of them.

That takes us through the opening credits and we then fade up on Jules (Samuel L. Jackson) and Vincent Vega (John Travolta) driving in their car with Vincent, who just returned from Amsterdam telling Jules of the subtle differences between Europe and the United States. They get to their destination and enter an apartment where Marvin, their contact is waiting, and Brett (Frank Whaley) and Roger (Burr Steers) are sitting eating breakfast. The tension is palpable as Roger admits to them where the missing case is. Vincent collects it and tells Jules that they’re good. Brett tries to talk their way out of it, and Jules shoots Roger without batting an eyelash. He then recites his famous passage from Ezekiel 25:17 before he and Vincent unload on Brett, gunning him down in cold blood.

PulpFictionJulesAndVincents

Abruptly we cut to a a bar and a close up of Butch Coolidge (Bruce Willis), a washed up prize fighter who is being talked to by an off screen Marcelus Wallace (Ving Rhames), who is convincing him why he should take a dive in the fight he’ll be in later. Butch agrees as he takes a wad of cash from Marcelus and then heads over to the bar where Vincent is waiting to meet with Marcelus. Vincent insults Butch a couple of times before Marcelus calls him over, leaving Butch standing there agape.

PulpFictionMiaAndVincentDance

Vincent has agreed to take Marcelus’s wife Mia (Uma Thurman) out and show her a good time while he’s not around, but he’s had to convince Jules and others that it’s not a date. Before going to pick her up, he goes to meet with his drug dealer Lance (Eric Stoltz), who sells him some of his best heroine. High as a kite, Vincent arrives at Mia’s house and a note left on the door invites him in and to poor himself a drink. Mia watches him on closed circuit TV while she snorts a couple of lines of cocaine. She then has Vincent take her to Jack Rabbit Slims, and there is a mild connection and attraction between the two of them that increases after they win the Jack Rabbit Slims Twist Contest. Vincent takes Mia home, and while he’s in the bathroom, she discovers the heroin in his jacket pocket. Thinking it’s cocaine, she lines some up and snorts it, causing her to immediately OD. Vincent emerges from the bathroom and discovers her. Seeing she’s nearly dead, he rushes her to Lance’s house, and tells a reluctant Lance who she is and the consequences waiting both of them if he doesn’t help. Lance has an adrenalin shot that Vincent plunges into her and she miraculously is revived. Vincent takes her home where she tells him the bad joke that she told on the one pilot she worked on before going into her house. Vincent blows her a kiss and is off.

PulpFictionGoldWatchp

We cut to a dream sequence where Butch remembers Captain Koons (Christopher Walken) meeting him when he was a young child and telling him of a gold watch that his great grandfather bought before going to World War I. He handed it to Butch’s grandfather who fought and died in World War II, and the watch was passed to Butch’s father who died of dysentery in a Vietnamese POW camp after hiding the watch up his ass for three years. Koons then hid it in his ass for two years and is here now presenting it to Butch. Butch’s young hand reaches up and grabs it, waking present day Butch from his nap. Butch is in the locker room, dressed for his boxing match. Rather than throwing the fight, Butch kills his opponent, having taken the action on his status after word got out that he was throwing it, and costing Marcelus his profits. Butch gets to his motel where his girlfriend Fabienne is waiting, and they talk of their plans to get away. The next morning, Butch can’t find his watch. Fabienne is sure she packed it, but then has to admit that she didn’t.

Frustrated and angry, Butch has to return to his apartment for the watch. He parks a couple of blocks away and sneaks through the back alleys of the neighborhood. He gets into his apartment and finds the watch. Thinking he’s in the clear, Butch throws a couple of toaster pastries in the toaster, then sees the automatic weapon on the counter. Then he hears the toilet flush. He picks up the gun and Vincent opens the door. After a long beat, Vincent shoots him dead and leaves. In his car waiting at the light, Marcelus is crossing with donuts and coffee. They see each other and Butch rams through him, but crashes into another car going through the intersection. When both men come to, Marcelus starts shooting at Butch, who limps down the street, eventually ducking into a pawn shop. Marcelus enters, but Butch has the drop on him, tackles him to the floor and starts beating him. He grabs Marcelus’ gun and is about to shoot him when we hear the click of a cocking shotgun. Maynard the owner of the shop knocks him out and calls Zed, telling him that the spider has caught a couple of flies.

PulpFictionButchAndMarcelusTiedUp

We next see Butch and Marcelus strapped to chairs with red balls blocking their mouths. Zed shows up and chooses Marcelus to do first, they drag the chair into another room and start raping him. Butch manages to get untied, and knocks out the Gimp that Maynard had taken out of a trunk. Butch runs upstairs and is halfway out the door when he looks back and hears Marcelus being tortured.  He looks through the drawers and finds a hammer. Then he sees a baseball bat. Then he sees a chainsaw. Finally he notices a samurai sword and takes it downstairs. As Maynard is distracted and turned on by Zed’s raping of Marcelus, Butch sneaks up behind him. Maynard notices him, but too late, and Butch stabs him before holding Zed at bay. As Zed is distracted by Butch, Marcelus has Maynard’s shotgun and shoots Zed in the balls. Butch and Marcelus work it out and Marcelus tells Butch never to tell anyone about this and to leave town. Butch leaves Marcelus standing over a mutilated Zed, and he heads for the street. Stealing Zed’s chopper, he picks up Fabienne and the two of them escape.

PulpFictionJulesAndVincentWithGuns

We then go back in time to Jules reciting Ezekiel 25:17, but we’re in the bathroom where another gang member is hiding. After they kill Brett, he bursts into the other room with his gun blazing, but he somehow misses Vincent and Jules. They give him a look and shoot him dead. Jules believes this to be a miracle, but Vincent is skeptical and an argument ensues. Jules won’t let them leave until Vincent recognizes this as a miracle, which he reluctantly does. In the car the argument continues with Marvin sitting in the back seat. Vincent, gun in hand, turns to talk to Marvin and his gun accidentally goes off, shooting Marvin in the face. Needing to get the car off the road, Jules calls his friend Jimmie (Tarantino) and they park the car in his garage. The problem for Jimmie is that his wife is due home soon, and they need to solve their problem fast. Jules calls Marcelus who sends over Mr. Wolf (Harvey Keitel), who basically tells them to clean the car. He also has a way to dispose of the body.

PulpFictionMrWolf

With that problem solved, Jules and Vincent decide to go get breakfast. They sit in a coffee shop, continuing to argue over whether or not what happened to them is a miracle. Either way, Jules decides he’s out of the business, and has seen that he has a higher calling. Vincent tells him he’s going to the bathroom, but they’ll continue this conversation when he’s out. While he’s in there, we see Pumpkin and Honey Bunny calling out that this is a robbery. The other customers are barely able to control their panic, but Jules calmly holds his gun under the table and his wallet in the air. When Pumpkin comes over to him, he demands to look in the case. Jules shows him then disarms him and puts his gun to Pumpkin’s head. Honey Bunny comes over to help, but Jules calms them down, and has Pumpkin sit across from him. He tells Pumpkin that he can’t have the case, but he lets him take the $1500 from his wallet. He then recites Ezekiel 25:17 to him and gives a couple of interpretations of it before letting him and Honey Bunny leave. Vincent suggest they get out of there and Jules concurs.

That’s the end of the movie, and Jules is the only character who gets no comeuppance. He rather has a literal come to Jesus moment, and makes the conscious decision to leave the murderous life behind, and he’s the only one who doesn’t have something bad happen to him in this film. All of the unrepentant bad guys do to varying degrees. Vincent gets killed by Butch. Mia OD’s and barely survives. Butch crashes his car and gets severely beaten and kidnapped. Marcelus gets beaten and raped. Jules, presumably, gets away.

Now don’t get me wrong by my phrasing. I don’t consider this a religious film in the least, but it is, as I said before, a morality play. The one guy in the film who walks away from the lifestyle is shown to have found peace. He’s shown to have discovered that there’s more to life than being a gangster or a hitman, and he’s happy to have discovered the change. What’s more, he’s unfazed by Vincent’s taunting of him about it. That thematic element makes this film very deep, and provides it with a message that is easy to overlook because of all of the other noise going on in the film, but once you see it it’s there loud and clear.

The other thing to remember with Pulp Fiction is what it did for the actors in it. This film essentially launched the careers of Jackson, Rhames and Thurman. All of them had been in other  and resurrected the careers of Willis and Travolta. Jackson was recognizable at that point and had been seen in films like Jurassic Park, Patriot Games, Menace II Society, Goodfellas and others, but Pulp Fiction made him a bonafide star. The same could be said for Uma Thurman, who had been in films like The Adventures of Baron Munchausen, Dangerous Liaisons and Even Cowgirls Get the Blues, but Pulp Fiction made her a household name. Pulp Fiction also revitalized the stagnant careers of both John Travolta and Bruce Willis. Remember that aside from the Look Who’s Talking movies, Travolta had been unable to even get arrested in Hollywood for about a decade. Willis was coming off a string of box office and critical busts, and it looked like his career was clearly waning. Pulp Fiction put both of them back on the A-list, and neither one of them has looked back since

Overall, Pulp Fiction is a film with deep story and thematic component that is highly entertaining and has some of the best dialogue that has ever been written. If it’s been a while since you’ve seen it, or if you’ve never seen it, don’t let the violence or disturbing subject matter scare you away. It’s actually not gratuitous in the least, but is important to the telling of the story and the presentation of the story’s message. This is a film that is worth seeing and essential viewing for any fan of the movies.